The 4 letter acronyms used to represent a person's personality (ESFJINTPESTJ etc) miss fundamental understanding of how this framework truly works.
Introversion (I) and Extraversion (E) imply an infinite description of a person's orientation. No person is an infinite extravert or an infinite introvert. Being told an incorrect infinite of an orientation that is a spectrum counters the framework infinitely. The same goes for the other acronym letters.
MBTI personality types are fundamentally their function stack. The function stack is your priority of thought put into a hierarchy. (Thoughts of the future, thoughts of the past, etc). Putting thoughts you think into a hierarchy is a fundamental representation of personality at its core.
There are two directions you can take for understanding a personality:
- Conscious personality typing.
- Subconscious personality typing.
Conscious personality tests such as The Big 5 and The Nine Enneagrams, tell you what is conscious. It tells you what you almost certainly already are going to know about yourself or another person. It is conscious understanding at a conscious level. Conscious personality typing touches very little of what is subconscious about a person. It tells you nothing of how a person fundamentally thinks.
MBTI personality tests are truly subconscious personality tests. Your priority of thought is a subconscious understanding of who you are. Priority of thought is a fundamental representation of who you are underneath. It is a fundamental science. Fundamental science is infinitely countered when the science itself uses acronyms like I or E (N or S, F or T, P or J) to represent infinites of orientation. MBTI is easily dismissed when a person types themselves from the 4 letter acronym alone. MBTI's naming schema is flawed. Your thought hierarchy is everything.
Fundamental representation of personality types.
Personality names must be a conscious description of a personality. However MBTI 4-letter acronyms are taken too far conscious. Phrases like "The Innovator" or "The Visionary" go the other direction and are too far subconsciously understood - every person will have a unique view of what they truly mean.
A conscious descriptive name must represent the personality to its conscious infinite.
- We must avoid using names that have varied subconscious understanding.
- We must avoid using acronyms that label infinites of orientation unless it is actually infinite.
- We must avoid using scales to represent a personality as scales are not fundamental representations knowing they may change.
- We must avoid using a naming convention that is hard to know what types match with.
- We must avoid using a naming convention that is hard to work out other egos in the same personality.
- We must avoid using a naming convention that requires good memory.
- We must ensure subconscious personality typing stays true to how it truly works. (Hierarchy of thought)
- We must ensure matching personality types are simple to work out.
- We must ensure the naming convention describes the personality to its conscious infinite.
- We must ensure we always use conscious descriptions of only fundamental infinites.
- We must ensure we do not counter the fundamental framework with unfundamental wording.
Hierarchy of thought is where we start as it is the first fundamental representation of personality.
What is unique about every personality?
Using the first 4 functions as an acronym (INFJ changed to NFTS to match the function hierarchy of Ni, Fe, Ti, Se) is hard to remember, difficult to understand, and doesn't have a easy to know correlation to other personalities with the same naming convention.
With everything in mind:
When I use my Ni hero I am a quiet and shy person engaged in my mind and I may look a bit consciously adrift. When I use my Ti child my persona changes to a more conversational thinker/speaker and I'm a little more extraverted and consciously engaged in my surroundings. Changing from one class to another is treated as the same ego personality even though they act in very different ways. These are fundamentally different personalities.
My Ni hero is not trapped into thinking only Ni thoughts. My Ni hero is very capable of thinking thoughts outside of Ni. I'm even able to Si without using my subconscious Si demon. The thoughts come from the same feeling of the same ego function. The thoughts are fully engaged with my Ni feelings. They do not come from other functions in the same conscious ego.
Knowing my Ni hero is a unique personality when I use it and that it can subconsciously think other types of thoughts would be a fundamental subconscious personality in my mind.
Subconscious personalities is the next fundamental level.INFJ has Fe parent.
If we treat Fe parent like it is its own ego/personality then we can fundamentally assume that Fe parent is its own Fe hero.
There are only two personalities with Fe as its hero:
But how do we determine which personality my Fe parent might be?
The differences between the two Isabel Briggs Myers has already done for us long ago:
N (Intuition) vs S (Sensing)
ENFJ vs ESFJ
Now we have to make a decision on how we determine fundamentally which personality my Fe parent is.
(N vs S is only for solving Fe's personality)
What's the consistent fundamental difference across all four categories originally imagined by Isabel Briggs Myers?:
Extraversion (E) vs Introversion (I)
Sensing (S) vs Intuition (N)
Thinking (T) vs Feeling (F)
Perceiving (P) vs Judging (J)
...
Answer: Orientation between conscious and subconscious.
This means that:
ESFJ is the conscious personality.
ENFJ is the subconscious personality.
(Relative to ExFJ)
Solving the questionFe can only exist in either the conscious or subconscious division of a personality type. With my latest updates to the framework I have also added conscious and subconscious labels.
This means that Fe in the conscious division is Fe conscious (Fec) and Fe in the subconscious division is Fe subconscious (Fes) and they think and feel in very different ways.
There are only two personalities with Fe hero - one is conscious (ESFJ), one is subconscious (ENFJ).
Fe-conscious can only match up with ESFJ
and
Fe-subconscious can only match up with ENFJ.
There are no other conflicting or overlapping personalities.
The same logic can be applied to all my other functions as well in the conscious division:
Now we can apply the same logic to all functions and personalities.
Notice the perfect 1 to 1 match with all function types and personality types?
There is zero overlap with other personalities. There is zero conflicts with any functions or any hero classes.
Nis instead of INFJ describes the INFJ's personality to its conscious infinite to perfection.
Fes instead of ENFJ describes the ENFJ's personality to its conscious infinite to perfection.
Tis instead of INTP describes the INTP's personality to its conscious infinite to perfection.
All the 3-letter acronyms are fundamental descriptions.
All the 3-letter acronyms describe the personality to it's fundamental infinite.
Matching personality types then become easy to recognise:
From INTJ & ENTP to Nic / Nec
From ISTJ & ESTP to Sic / Sec
From ENTJ & INTP to Tes / Tis
Working out a person's division heros becomes simple to calculate:
(S and N are opposites)
(F and T is the other opposite)
Most of the public understand personalities as the old 4 letters and what they each stand for.
MBTI naming system is outdated.
True understanding is the function stack.
True understanding at its infinite fundamental is knowing the hero (Conscious / subconscious).
The original 4-letter acronym system lacks consistent parallels between all personalities.
The original 4-letter acronym system is associated with gross misunderstandings over how this framework works.
The original 4-letter acronym system counters the fundamental framework infinitely with unfundamental infinite descriptions.
New acronyms (Nis, Sic, Tes, etc) shows you have function stack understanding.
New acronyms separates yourself from armchair psychologists.
New acronyms counters arrogant assumptions and judgements over how this framework works.
New acronyms stops a fundamental science from being seen as a metascience.
"A conscious descriptive name must represent the personality to its conscious infinite."
Psychology has been outdated for a long time.
Function personalities (Devil types):
Nic (Ni conscious) = INTJ
Nis (Ni subconscious) = INFJ
Nec (Ne conscious) = ENTP
Nes (Ne subconscious) = ENFP
Fic (Fi conscious) = ISFP
Fis (Fi subconscious) = INFP
Fec (Fe conscious) = ESFJ
Fes (Fe subconscious) = ENFJ
Tic (Ti conscious) = ISTP
Tis (Ti subconscious) = INTP
Tec (Te conscious) = ESTJ
Tes (Te subconscious) = ENTJ
Sic (Si conscious) = ISTJ
Sis (Si subconscious) = ESFJ
Sec (Se conscious) = ESTP
Ses (Se subconscious) = ESFP
This new level of specificity over conscious and subconscious functions opened up a whole new level of understanding personality types.
Going subconscious.
Now we have a personality for each class/function in every personality type.
Putting this together and expanding, the INFJ's Ni Hero would be an INTJ (Using my assumed logic):
INFJ Ni Hero (INTJ) = NiTeFiSeNeTiFeSi
Naturally now I can expand each function downwards now that I can determine a personality for each class/function relative to the personality type:
wow
The Si function in column 2 and 7 look swapped with the Ni function.
Also the Se function in column 2 and 7 break the diagonal Ne.
Also see the null personalities [?] in the horizontal columns (The conscious functions are correct but the subconscious functions don't match the same personality so it breaks what personality it could have been)
My logic to determine which personality to pick for each function was based off an assumption however it brought me to this moment. It seems like the pattern is broken which implies my logic was wrong. This shows that there is another method for determining which personality to pick.
Now I can dig into this new view of the data and personality types and search for a pattern to follow from.
To begin fixing I'd have to Change ESTJ to an ENTJ and ENFJ to an ESFJ to swap the Ni and Si around:
This is already looking much better however the 4 null rows are all personality types that dont exist.
This is the data I was manipulating in order to fix and adjust the chart:
I'm using the same data for all classes in the same personality.
I was able to make the Ni Hero align perfectly but then all the other classes had misalignment issues:
There must be an alignment that fits together.
We can assume that the INFJ (Nis) and ESTP (Sec) have the same alignment as they share the same functions across their conscious and subconscious. The same goes with all the other personality types and their primary alter ego.
I can simplify my data now into the functions and their type.
I just have to work out what each function would be (c or s). Which would link to a personality type.
I solved everything:
Final data and completed model below:
(Turns out the INFJNi Hero is the INFJ (Nis) I had originally assumed. And it's circular.)
This data can be reduced further creating two new fundamental personality groups:
And now it can be reduced even further:
And now we have a fundamental separation between personality types based off their function type.
Let's use the labels if applicable: Ns, Fs, Tc, Sc, Nc, Fc, Ts, Ss.
This natural separation is another conscious/subconscious divide.
That data alone allowed me to fundamentally solve personality types to their circular infinite and I've built a representation of it here:
The model above is a circular representation of the INFJ.
You can extend this model further by extending into the Y axis to create a 3d rubix cube.
It's circular b/c every inner function has the same hierarchy and set of functions in the same order. You can dive infinitely into every function and you'll always have this same model as the representation. It's the Hero function recurring infinitely. It doesn't matter what class you use it is always within a Nis Hero (For the INFJ).
Every class personality links back to the same 8 personalities.
This new model gives subconscious feelings in your mind conscious visual representation.
It's a fundamental visual representation of how you think.
It's a fundamental visual representation of subconscious feelings.
With the reverse switch disabled, the functions going in the opposite diagonal (↗ ↙) (Sic Demon and Sec Inferior) to the hero function (↘ ↖) (Nis Hero) are the first fundamental visual representations (And proof) of opposing functions.
Fes Parent also travels in the same diagonal as the hero (Supporting).
Tic Child also travels in the same diagonal as the hero (Supporting).
Fis Critic travels in the opposite diagonal as the hero (Opposing).
Tec Trickster travels in the opposite diagonal as the hero (Opposing).
Nes Nemesis travels in the same diagonal as the hero but is a right brain function. (Evil thoughts that satisfy the hero) (Supporting).
We have now unlocked a representation of many heroes, parents, children, etc within a personality type and a hierarchy that spans infinitely.
In the original standard order originally developed by John Beebe (1: Hero, 2: Parent, 3: Child, 4: Inferior, 5: Nemesis, 6: Critic, 7: Trickster, 8: Demon) the functions alignment (extraverted / introverted) pattern doesn't link together when merging the function order however with a reversed subconscious, introverted / extraverted lines up beautifully:
Inferior -> Demon is a natural switch into the subconscious personality.
Every domino in the reversed chart represents a switch into subconscious personality types.
We've also unlocked new fundamental descriptions for roles in personality types:
Fundamental representation of personality types. Personality names must be a conscious description of a personality. However MBTI 4-letter acronyms are taken too far conscious. Phrases like "The Innovator" or "The Visionary" go the other direction and are too far subconsciously understood - every person will have a unique view of what they truly mean. A conscious descriptive name must represent the personality to its conscious infinite. - We must avoid using names that have varied subconscious understanding. - We must avoid using acronyms that label infinites of orientation unless it is actually infinite. - We must avoid using scales to represent a personality as scales are not fundamental representations knowing they may change. - We must avoid using a naming convention that is hard to know what types match with. - We must avoid using a naming convention that is hard to work out other egos in the same personality. - We must avoid using a naming convention that requires good memory. - We must ensure subconscious personality typing stays true to how it truly works. (Hierarchy of thought) - We must ensure matching personality types are simple to work out. - We must ensure the naming convention describes the personality to its conscious infinite. - We must ensure we always use conscious descriptions of only fundamental infinites. - We must ensure we do not counter the fundamental framework with unfundamental wording. Hierarchy of thought is where we start as it is the first fundamental representation of personality. What is unique about every personality? Using the first 4 functions as an acronym (INFJ changed to NFTS to match the function hierarchy of Ni, Fe, Ti, Se) is hard to remember, difficult to understand, and doesn't have a easy to know correlation to other personalities with the same naming convention. With everything in mind: When I use my Ni hero I am a quiet and shy person engaged in my mind and I may look a bit consciously adrift. When I use my Ti child my persona changes to a more conversational thinker/speaker and I'm a little more extraverted and consciously engaged in my surroundings. Changing from one class to another is treated as the same ego personality even though they act in very different ways. These are fundamentally different personalities. My Ni hero is not trapped into thinking only Ni thoughts. My Ni hero is very capable of thinking thoughts outside of Ni. I'm even able to Si without using my subconscious Si demon. The thoughts come from the same feeling of the same ego function. The thoughts are fully engaged with my Ni feelings. They do not come from other functions in the same conscious ego. Knowing my Ni hero is a unique personality when I use it and that it can subconsciously think other types of thoughts would be a fundamental subconscious personality in my mind. Subconscious personalities is the next fundamental level. INFJ has Fe parent.
If we treat Fe parent like it is its own ego/personality then we can fundamentally assume that Fe parent is its own Fe hero. There are only two personalities with Fe as its hero:
But how do we determine which personality my Fe parent might be? The differences between the two Isabel Briggs Myers has already done for us long ago: N (Intuition) vs S (Sensing) ENFJ vs ESFJ Now we have to make a decision on how we determine fundamentally which personality my Fe parent is. (N vs S is only for solving Fe's personality) What's the consistent fundamental difference across all four categories originally imagined by Isabel Briggs Myers?: Extraversion (E) vs Introversion (I) Sensing (S) vs Intuition (N) Thinking (T) vs Feeling (F) Perceiving (P) vs Judging (J) ... Answer: Orientation between conscious and subconscious.
This means that: ESFJ is the conscious personality. ENFJ is the subconscious personality. (Relative to ExFJ) Solving the question
Fe can only exist in either the conscious or subconscious division of a personality type. With my latest updates to the framework I have also added conscious and subconscious labels.
This means that Fe in the conscious division is Fe conscious (Fec) and Fe in the subconscious division is Fe subconscious (Fes) and they think and feel in very different ways. There are only two personalities with Fe hero - one is conscious (ESFJ), one is subconscious (ENFJ). Fe-conscious can only match up with ESFJ and Fe-subconscious can only match up with ENFJ. There are no other conflicting or overlapping personalities. The same logic can be applied to all my other functions as well in the conscious division:
Now we can apply the same logic to all functions and personalities.
Notice the perfect 1 to 1 match with all function types and personality types? There is zero overlap with other personalities. There is zero conflicts with any functions or any hero classes. Nis instead of INFJ describes the INFJ's personality to its conscious infinite to perfection. Fes instead of ENFJ describes the ENFJ's personality to its conscious infinite to perfection. Tis instead of INTP describes the INTP's personality to its conscious infinite to perfection. All the 3-letter acronyms are fundamental descriptions. All the 3-letter acronyms describe the personality to it's fundamental infinite. Matching personality types then become easy to recognise: From INTJ & ENTP to Nic / Nec From ISTJ & ESTP to Sic / Sec From ENTJ & INTP to Tes / Tis Working out a person's division heros becomes simple to calculate:
(S and N are opposites) (F and T is the other opposite) Most of the public understand personalities as the old 4 letters and what they each stand for. MBTI naming system is outdated. True understanding is the function stack. True understanding at its infinite fundamental is knowing the hero (Conscious / subconscious). The original 4-letter acronym system lacks consistent parallels between all personalities. The original 4-letter acronym system is associated with gross misunderstandings over how this framework works. The original 4-letter acronym system counters the fundamental framework infinitely with unfundamental infinite descriptions. New acronyms (Nis, Sic, Tes, etc) shows you have function stack understanding. New acronyms separates yourself from armchair psychologists. New acronyms counters arrogant assumptions and judgements over how this framework works. New acronyms stops a fundamental science from being seen as a metascience. "A conscious descriptive name must represent the personality to its conscious infinite."
wow The Si function in column 2 and 7 look swapped with the Ni function. Also the Se function in column 2 and 7 break the diagonal Ne. Also see the null personalities [?] in the horizontal columns (The conscious functions are correct but the subconscious functions don't match the same personality so it breaks what personality it could have been) My logic to determine which personality to pick for each function was based off an assumption however it brought me to this moment. It seems like the pattern is broken which implies my logic was wrong. This shows that there is another method for determining which personality to pick. Now I can dig into this new view of the data and personality types and search for a pattern to follow from. To begin fixing I'd have to Change ESTJ to an ENTJ and ENFJ to an ESFJ to swap the Ni and Si around:
This is already looking much better however the 4 null rows are all personality types that dont exist. This is the data I was manipulating in order to fix and adjust the chart:
I'm using the same data for all classes in the same personality. I was able to make the Ni Hero align perfectly but then all the other classes had misalignment issues:
I just have to work out what each function would be (c or s). Which would link to a personality type.
This data can be reduced further creating two new fundamental personality groups:
And now it can be reduced even further:
And now we have a fundamental separation between personality types based off their function type. Let's use the labels if applicable: Ns, Fs, Tc, Sc, Nc, Fc, Ts, Ss. This natural separation is another conscious/subconscious divide. That data alone allowed me to fundamentally solve personality types to their circular infinite and I've built a representation of it here:
Fes Parent also travels in the same diagonal as the hero (Supporting). Tic Child also travels in the same diagonal as the hero (Supporting). Fis Critic travels in the opposite diagonal as the hero (Opposing). Tec Trickster travels in the opposite diagonal as the hero (Opposing). Nes Nemesis travels in the same diagonal as the hero but is a right brain function. (Evil thoughts that satisfy the hero) (Supporting). We have now unlocked a representation of many heroes, parents, children, etc within a personality type and a hierarchy that spans infinitely. In the original standard order originally developed by John Beebe (1: Hero, 2: Parent, 3: Child, 4: Inferior, 5: Nemesis, 6: Critic, 7: Trickster, 8: Demon) the functions alignment (extraverted / introverted) pattern doesn't link together when merging the function order however with a reversed subconscious, introverted / extraverted lines up beautifully:
Inferior -> Demon is a natural switch into the subconscious personality. Every domino in the reversed chart represents a switch into subconscious personality types.
We've also unlocked new fundamental descriptions for roles in personality types: